(a) CZJ = Carl Zeiss Jena (pre war)
It
does seem that very low numbers do exist, and it is suggested that they begin
at Jena at 1,000 in about 1890, unless information to the contrary is found.
There
may also be unnumbered lenses, possibly when they are one of a stereo pair,
though confusion with licencees lenses can occur.
There
seems then to be a gap to 1912.
Two
listings then exist, and run very much in parallel. One is by G. Gilbert, in
"Collecting Photographica" and is reproduced in the back of Mc
Keown's "Price Guide". The other is given in "Chiffres
Cles" by P-H. Pont.
As
a collector, the main point is that they do tell the same story within the time
span that interests one.
The
following is a shortened version of the one in "Chiffres Clef" with
some extra notes added from experience here. It is tentative in places.
1890 Anastigmat production begins. this is partly
licensed to others, including Voigtlaender for Germany. The earliest Zeiss
Anastigmat noted so far is No 1,51x suggesting a possible No 1,000 start at
Jena for camera lenses: but note an aplanat for projection seems anomalous.
1895 Voigtlaender stops production of Zeiss designs,
suggesting Zeiss had expanded production facilities to make the lenses at Jena.
1900 c. 44,040 as Unar sales begin, production of
anastigmats reaches 100,000, with about 44,000 by Zeiss and 56,000 under
license.
1902 Tessar f 6.3 launched. This must have been one
factor leading to a big expansion of demand and production.
1908 91,711 + 103,3xx, 104,2xx noted on cameras
burgled at N&G, London (Manthos article), but note N&G may have lagged
in fitting as cameras made in 1912 had lenses No 133,73x- say a year in store
or transit.
Year Serial Number (begin + end) numbers
used
1912 173,418 - 200,520 27,102
1913 208,473 - 249,350 40,877 Carl Zeiss London here (see below)
1914 249,886 - c252,739 2,853
1915 c282,800 - c284,500 1,700
1916 c285,200 - c288,100 2,900
1917 289,087 - 298,157 9,070
1918 298,215 - 322,748 24,533
1919 322,799 - 351,611 28,812
1920 375,194 - 419,823 44,629
1921 433,273 - 438,361 5,088
1922 422,899 - 498,006 75,107
1923 561,270 - 578,297 17,027
1924 578,297 - 631,501 53,204
1925 c631,500 - c648,500 29,513
1926 666,790 - 703,198 36,408
1927 722,196 - 798,251 76,055
1928 c903,100 - c908,150 5,050
1929 919,794 - 1,016,885 97,091
1930 922,488 - 1,239,697 317,209
1931 1,239,699 - 1,365,582 125,883 First Contax lenses here.
1932 1,364,483 - 1,389,279 24,796
1933 1,436,671 - 1,456,003 19,332
1934 1,500,474 - 1,590,000 89,526
1935 1,615,764 - 1,752,303 136,539
1936 1,674,882 - 1,942,806 267,924 chrome finish begins at c1,89 million.
1937 1,930,150 - 2,219,775 289,625
1938 2,267,991 - 2,527,984 259,993
1939 2,527,999 - 2,651,211 123,212
1940 2,652,000 - c2,678,000 26,000
1941 2,678,326 - 2,790,346 112,020
1942 2,800,000 - ?
Note
the variation in the number per year. Now a plant of a successful company does
not vary that much in production rate unless there is diversion to other
products, as is likely during a war (binoculars?, gunsights?) numbered in
another series. Or there is a cessation of materials or labour, which can also
happen in war. These will have affected things in say 1916 to 1918 but it does
seem likely that the numbers used in 1913 are a "funny" and one feels
they include some for 1914 as well.
Also
note that there are gaps between the "Years lens" numbers, as for No
252,739 in 1914 end and No 282,800 for 1915 begin, where 30,061 numbers are
"missing."
The
tables admit that the WW1 data is approximate and this might explain the low
figure apparent for 1914. It seems likely that there was a carry over of
numbers in some years from one year to the next, due to numbers being booked
for a contract or sale in advance- or some such mechanism.
There
is a instinctive feeling that in 1912, the plant was actually normally making
about 25,000-30,000 lenses. Now going backwards, it is likely that production
had built up slowly as labour was trained and plant designed and built, and
that a typical serial number for 1900 might be No 40,000 (as suggested above),
rather than No 75,000 which would be the mid-point from No 1000 to say No
151,000 in 1910.
After
WW1, there is a rapid recovery of production, but again there are big
fluctuations in the apparent yearly numbers produced.
There
are also still gaps between the blocks of numbers attributed to years. It does
seem that production was set to rise steadily in the 1920's, even though there
was a recession, and especially after the formation of Zeiss Ikon with the
related rationalizations and a "captive" market.
Thus
by 1930, there do seem to be some 100,000 or more per year, and then in the
1930's, up to 250,000 or 300,000 numbers per year used. This suggests a major
expansion at Jena, or just possible the use of the redundant plants of
Goerz/Berlin and Ernemann/Dresden to support the production in some way.
All
this does also raise one point: that any maker quickly finds that while brass
and glass cost money, numbers are "free" and makers often
"waste" numbers when plans change or products are cancelled. Thus it
is normal to find cases where lenses were never made to match numbers reserved
for them.
One
is left with a feeling that early Zeiss lenses are rare and should be very
desired items. An authentic list Carl Zeiss supplied to a friend in 1967, with
the same general result, was as follows:
150,000 - 200,000 1912 ca.
200,000 - 300,000 1912-1916
300,000 - 350,000 1916-1919
350,000 - 500,000 1919-1923
500,000 - 750,000 1923-1926
750,000 - 1,000,000 1926-1929
1,000,000 - 1,500,000 1929-1934
1,500,000 - 2,000,000 1934-1937
2,000,000 - 2,800,000 1937-1942
After
WW2, Carl Zeiss at Oberkochen began a new series of numbers, probably at No
1,000 or 10,000 and as indicated above, these were normally also marked Opton
and coated. The Opton mark lasted for most purposes until about 1953 at No
1,100,000 but was used for many more years for items sold in the Comecon
countries- which will cause confusion if it is not realized. More data than
this is in P-H Pont's "Chiffres Cles".
POST WAR
(b) CZJ = Carl Zeiss Jena Postwar (DDR - East Germany)
2,842,301 primo Tessar 5cm
f/3,5 CZJ DDR (si distinguono dalla scritta “Germany”)
2,970,000 primo Sonnar
5cm/2.0 CZJ DDR
1945-1949 3,00 - 3,20 million Initially
with the focal length in centimeters.
1949-1952 3,20 - 3,47 million
1952-1955 3,47 - 4,00 million From here focal lengths were given in millimeters.
1955-1958 4,00 - 5,00 million
1958-1961 5,00 - 6,00 million
1961-1964 6,00 - 6,70 million
1964-1967 7,00 - 8,00 million
1967-1970 8,00 - 9,00 million
1970-1975 9,00 - 10,0 million
(c) CZ = Zeiss-Opton / Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen (RFT - West Germany)
1946-1951
10,000-500,000 These will be engraved Zeiss Opton,
1949
la prima ottica Zeiss-Option per Contax è un Sonnar 135/4 sn 91,001 del 1949,
ma si tratta di un lotto isolato fabbricato a Coburgo
1951
parte la produzione regolare per Contax con un Sonnar 50/1,5 sn 47,000 del
1951, con sn dunque inferiore rispetto a quello di due anni prima!
questo
dimostra come la numerazione sia indipendente dalla cronologia
1951-1953 500,000 - 1,100,000 (*)
1953-1953 1,100,000 - 1,256,000
1953-1959 1,256,001 - 2,600,000 Now just Carl Zeiss (**) except for Comecon sales
1959-1961 2,600,000 - 3,000,000
1961-1965 3,000,000 - 4,000,000
1965-1969 4,000,000 - 5,000,000
1969-1971 5,000,000 - 6,000,000
1971-1975 6,000,000 - 7,300,000
(*)
i primi Zeiss Opton avevano una T rossa (che io conosca con SN più alto con T
rossa è 887,xxx)
(**)
Ufficialmente il cambio di nome si ebbe al sn 1,256,000
tuttavia
si conoscono eccezioni:
Carl
Zeiss con SN 1,167,xxx
Carl
Zeiss con SN 824,840
Carl
Zeiss con SN 820,412
I
numeri di matricola dei singoli obiettivi possono servire come riferimento per identificare
l’anno di produzione, ma in realtà questo metodo non è sempre esatto. Alcuni
obiettivi sono stati fabbricati all’interno di lotti fuori dalle normali
sequenze produttive, per cui non sempre la sequenza numerica risulta rispettata
correttamente.
Un
esempio lampante è dato da alcuni lotti d’obiettivi Sonnar 13,5 cm, inizianti
col numero di matricola 1,500,000, sequenza che normalmente si riferisce al
1934, ma che in realtà è stata assegnata ad obiettivi prodotti nel 1936 ed
oltre. In casi come questo è probabile che gli obiettivi in questione
appartenessero a serie speciali, forniture particolari, o fossero esemplari di
pre-produzione.
Altro
esempio di confusione numerica si è verificato verso la metà degli anni Trenta,
quando la produzione degli obiettivi neri e nichelati si è sovrapposta alla
nuova serie d’ottiche cromate. In ogni caso è accertato che esistono lotti
lasciati momentaneamente liberi ma poi assegnati successivamente.
Dell’Orthometar 3,5 cm mancano, ad esempio, le date di consegna per ambedue i
lotti costruttivi.
Durante
la guerra, tra il 1940 e il 1945, la situazione si fa sempre più confusa: i
numeri di matricola si accavallano senza apparente logica.
Ad
esempio, vi sono lotti del 1944 posizionati come numerazione all’interno del
1940, e numerosi lotti del 1941 che possiedono numeri di matricola superiori ai
lotti del 1945.
Gli
obiettivi con numerazione intorno a 2,600,000 in apparenza prodotti negli anni
1944/45, appartengono quasi sempre a lotti del 1940, e in generale la numerazione
tra 2,600,000 e 2,700,000 è quasi sempre inaffidabile per identificare l’esatto
anno di produzione.
La
situazione si stabilizza solo nei primi mesi del 1946, quando la normale
sequenza numerica viene ristabilita.
Anche
per quello che riguarda i registri di Oberkochen si assiste a contraddizioni
nella numerazione.
Citiamo
ad esempio un Sonnar 50mm f/2, con sn 824,840 ed un Sonnar 50 mm f/1,5 con sn
820,412 marcati ‘Carl Zeiss’, che teoricamente dovrebbero essere marcati "Zeiss–Opton”, poiché i Sonnar siglati Carl Zeiss sono iniziati ufficialmente
solo col numero 1,256,001.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento